BREAKING NEWS: RELEASED EMAILS SHOWS OBAMA ADMIN OFFICIALS COORDINATED TO SET UP RUSSIAN NARRATIVE

SUMMARY FROM VARIOUS NEWS ARTICLES

Newly released emails obtained by the Senate intelligence committee shows that obama administration officials in the department of justice along with obama Whitehouse OFFICIALS and FBI officials coordinated with CNN to set up Russian collusion narrative.

The investigation is all based on the steele dossier which was paid for by the Clinton campaign. Now its being used to investigate Trump. The steele dossier is unproven and the informations it contained were supplied by Russians working for Putin. The same Putin who is President of Russia and who is supposed allegedly helped Trump win.

Why did the Russians supplied these informations on Trump if they were helping him win the elections? This does not make sense. The Russians provided informations to Steele which were against Trump who they were trying to help win. Its like pushing your man to the finishing line and then trip him when he won the race.

Anyways, these emails shows that obama officials in the Whitehouse, the FBI & DOJ all came together after the elections and cooked up this Russian collusion story along with none other than CNN.

«1

Comments

  • Comey claimed that he was compelled to brief Trump on the dossier because “CNN had [it]” and was “looking for a news hook.”

    Hours before Comey briefed Trump, FBI chief of staff James Rybicki e-mailed staff that Comey “is coming into HQ briefly now for an update from the sensitive matter team.” Just as the same officials dubbed the Clinton e-mail investigation the “mid-year exam” and the anti-Trump counterintelligence investigation “Crossfire Hurricane,” they also used various phrases using “sensitive” to refer obliquely to the dossier.

    Two days after the briefing, on January 8, 2017, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, who earlier this year was fired and then referred for criminal prosecution by the DOJ inspector general for repeatedly lying about media leaks, wrote an e-mail to top FBI officials with the subject, “Flood is coming.”

    “CNN is close to going forward with the sensitive story,” McCabe wrote to Comey, Rybicki, and two others. “The trigger for them is they know the material was discussed in the brief and presented in an attachment.” He did not detail how he came to know what CNN’s “trigger” was for publishing the dossier briefing story.

    Although the January 10 story from CNN also claimed that Trump was presented with a two-page summary of the dossier, which was not part of the official intelligence community assessment given to Trump, Comey himself later claimed that he did not give the two-page document to Trump, raising questions about whether McCabe himself was a source for CNN’s assertion that Trump had been given the entire two-page document during the briefing.

    Shortly after sending his e-mail to Comey and other FBI officials, McCabe e-mailed then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and her deputy, Matthew Axelrod. McCabe used the subject line “News” in his e-mail to the DOJ officials.

    “Just as an FYI, and as expected,” McCabe wrote, “it seems CNN is close to running a story about the sensitive reporting.” It is not clear how McCabe came to be so familiar with CNN’s understanding of the dossier, its briefing, or how close CNN was to reporting on the matter.

    In a Monday letter to FBI director Christopher Wray, Sen. Johnson, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, asked the director to provide a list of all members of the “sensitive matters team” referenced by Rybicki in his January 6 e-mail. Johnson also requested that Wray provide all details about how FBI officials “first learned that media outlets, including CNN, may have possessed the Steele dossier.”

    To date, there is no public evidence that the FBI ever investigated the leaks to media about the briefing between Trump and Comey. When asked in a recent interview by Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier, Comey scoffed at the idea that the FBI would even need to investigate the leak of a secret briefing with the incoming president.

    “Did you or your subordinates leak that?” Baier asked.

    “No,” Comey responded. “I don’t know who leaked it.”

    “Did you ever try to find out?” Baier asked.

    “Who leaked an unclassified public document?” Comey said, even though Baier’s question was about leaking details of a briefing of the incoming president, not the dossier. “No,” Comey said.

    http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/21/breaking-e-mails-show-fbi-brass-discussed-dossier-briefing-details-cnn/
  • What is your point, exactly?
  • Mr. President, did you know about the payment to your porno girlfriend? Orange sphincter, No. liar and the ass clowns that follow him in micsem proclaiming him the best immoral leader the USA has ever had.
  • deep into the fake news.. fox news probably or the Trump news medias may be? all baseless!! according to the special meeting released, "no evident of spying into Trump's campaign. but the fake news is taking its effect on Micsem like it dose to the the 30%.. it annoying .
  • @Sarem, the point is all this collusion nonsense all have their roots in the last administration of the popolo aka obama. Who was warned by the FBI but did nothing because he was sure his secretary of state was going to win. When it came out the opposite he ok'ed this conspiracy theory which is now called Russia's helping Trump. All because of the unproven dossier paid for by his Secretary of state's campaign and the Democratic National Committee. The sources behind the dossier are none other than Russians working for Putin.

    @Visafree, if the allegations of the spying of Trump campaign by Obama's FBI are fake why is eric holder and Brennan so against the DOJ looking into it? Why are these former Obama administration officials so against the DOJ investigations into it. If it was nothing why are they resisting it?
  • Did we forget about the lessons of Watergate?

    Here is the New York Times, one of the media outlets that tried hard to get Hillary Clinton elected.

    From the NEW YORK TIMES: "In fact, F.B.I. agents sent an informant to talk to two campaign advisers only after they received evidence that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign. The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia."https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/us/politics/trump-fbi-informant-russia-investigation.html

    So much for fake news and unfounded claims when thr FBI USED a informer to spy on the Trump campaign as stated by the New York Times.
  • So much for those who dismissed charges of Obama administration infiltration of Donald Trump’s campaign as paranoid fantasy. Defenders of the Obama intelligence and law enforcement apparat have had to fall back on the argument that this infiltration was for Trump’s — and the nation’s — own good.

    Until 2016, just about everyone agreed that it was a bad thing for government intelligence or law enforcement agencies to spy — er, use informants — on a political campaign, especially one of the opposition party. Liberals were especially suspicious of the FBI and the CIA. Nowadays they say that anyone questioning their good faith is unpatriotic.
    https://nypost.com/2018/05/27/obamas-spying-scandal-is-starting-to-look-a-lot-like-watergate/


    Its bad if Nixon spied on democrats but a good thing if democrats do and spy on their republican opposition aka Trump.
  • But what is your point?
  • @Sarem, the point is all this collusion nonsense all have their roots in the last administration of the popolo aka obama.
  • Obstruction of justice is coming for your orange monkey
  • Campaign fraud is heading you verbal diarrhea fake hair, fake skin color and fake educated fraud way
  • Popolo is Hawaiian for black, obviously Reaper is living somewhere here in Hawaii.
  • I thought ele'ele was the the Hawaiian word for black while Popolo was the Hawaiian word for curly hair.
  • You could be right, I am new here to Hawaii and I am leaving pretty soon.
  • I'm going to make one prediction here on who in the Obama administration gave the Ok to the FBI to put a mole to spy on the Trump campaign. Sally Yates! Thats the person from the last administration who gave the green light. In the coming months Sallys name will be all over the news. Yates is the name i got from a buddy who works for the DOJ.

    All this russian collusion is just a smoke screen. To distract us and to hinder the Trump administration from going after the Clintons. That's all im going to say for now.
  • So even though it’s drumpfs administration and his DOJ and FBI, black momba had something to do with the investigation? Porno stop bending over and start walking upright.
  • @Reaper, you got it all wrong!. There is a big different between spy and informant and Trump choose to use the word" spy" to make it look and sound suspicious but the fact is FBI and DOJ were there in Trumps campaign to collect information on Russian meddling in the election, this is normal operation and they did by the book but ignorance Trump wanted to throw attention away from the attention away from investigation.. BTW Eirc is former AG to Obama and Brennen is former CIA director both and trying to protect the national security from trump's lawlessness action

  • Hey orange monkey! Why you so frustrated? If you innocent then why you doing all this talking?
  • @Visafree, a informant is a spy. Same difference. Same thing. Interchangeable. Potato Domahto. Anyway the records shows that it was after the elections did the obama administration got the Russian collusion thing going. After their candidate lost.

    Eric and Brennan are protecting their own skins. Both lied under oath. Both now working for CNN. These are the rotten apples Trump was talking about.
  • wrong again, long before that , long before the primary, when it happened. Trump promised to drain the swamp but failed, it became worst till today.. so much for a legacy!
  • @Visafree, the investigations only started AFTER the elections. Draining the Swamp is happening. Many career politicians in either the left and right are not up for reelection. Many obama era laws and protocols have been drained.
  • And many acts are being investigated, obstruction of justice, campaign fraud, Russia collusion, the true hair and skin color of orange sphincter
  • Regardless of all the criticisms of President Donald Trump, the USA under President Trump is doing great. This is good for the Security of the Federated States of Micronesia.
  • The campaign fraud and obstruction of justice are just rumors. The only thing being pursued and investigated is the allegations of Russian collusion. And thus far there has ben no single evidence to suggest or connect Trump and Russia.
  • BTW,there are two investigations.. which one are you talking about ?.. these laws your talking about that Trump got rid of them are the laws that help the middle class and the low income families most of them happened to be our own families and friends.. Do you really Think these are good decisions made by Trump? I Trump did these to make America suffer again.
  • Pussy grabber is going down
  • edited June 1
    Mueller has but one mandate and that is to investigate if there was collusion between the Trump and Russia. 2 years and multiple US Intel agencies have found no evidence of collusion. Safe to say Mueller will find none also. If the big bad National Security Agency found no evidence what makes you think Mueller will?
  • Because the more orange sphincter cries and throws obstacles, the more obvious his guilt. Come on reefer, you know a liar when you hear one. You fool.
Sign In or Register to comment.